It's Trump Vs JD Vance Right Now

In partnership with

Your Boss Will Think You’re an Ecom Genius

You’re optimizing for growth. You need ecom tactics that actually work. Not mushy strategies.

Go-to-Millions is the ecommerce growth newsletter from Ari Murray, packed with tactical insights, smart creative, and marketing that drives revenue.

Every issue is built for operators: clear, punchy, and grounded in what’s working, from product strategy to paid media to conversion lifts.

Subscribe free and get your next growth unlock delivered weekly.

Sign up now

It's been a rough week for Trump. His recent interview with Laura Ingraham revealed a series of policy positions that starkly contrasted with the expectations of his base, particularly on immigration and economic priorities. Trump’s advocacy for allowing up to 600,000 Chinese students into American universities and his push for more H-1B visas to address alleged shortages of skilled workers have sparked backlash among supporters who voted for an "America First" agenda. These stances, while perhaps pragmatic from a certain perspective, diverge significantly from the populist rhetoric that propelled Trump to office and continue to define much of his political identity. This dissonance highlights a critical tension within the Republican Party, one that is increasingly personified by Vice President JD Vance, who appears to embody a more consistent and resonant version of America First principles.

Trump’s missteps this week are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of policy decisions that have frustrated his base. The proposal to increase the number of Chinese students in U.S. universities, framed as a necessity to keep these institutions financially viable, overlooks the concerns of voters who prioritize domestic interests and view such measures as prioritizing foreign entities over American citizens. Similarly, Trump’s call for more H-1B visas to import foreign talent directly contradicts the narrative of protecting American jobs and workers, a cornerstone of his 2016 and 2020 campaigns. These positions suggest a willingness to compromise on core campaign promises, potentially alienating voters who feel that the essence of "America First" is being diluted. While Trump’s intentions may be rooted in economic pragmatism, the execution and messaging have failed to align with the expectations of his most loyal supporters, who see these policies as a betrayal of the very principles they championed.

In contrast, JD Vance’s recent remarks at the Make America Healthy Again summit offer a clearer, more cohesive vision of America First policies that resonate deeply with the working-class voters who form the backbone of the Republican base. Vance’s speech, as captured in Eric Daugherty’s post, directly addresses the frustrations of Americans who feel left behind by globalization and economic policies that prioritize other nations over domestic needs. "You want to talk about populism? You want to talk about people being pissed off? Well, yeah, people are pissed off when they don't have good jobs! And people are pissed off when things disappear and move overseas!" Vance’s words capture the raw anger and sense of betrayal felt by many in regions like Appalachia, where job losses and declining life expectancy are stark reminders of decades of neglect. His acknowledgment that "people are pissed off when they feel like other countries are being prioritized over the United States of America" underscores a commitment to national sovereignty and economic nationalism that aligns perfectly with the America First doctrine.

Vance’s understanding of these issues is not merely rhetorical; it is deeply personal and informed by his own experiences. As he stated, "You know what REALLY pisses people off? When they realize that their loved ones are dying much sooner than everybody else. That's what's going on in Appalachia. SO MANY people in Appalachia feel left behind!" This connection to the lived realities of working-class Americans, particularly in economically depressed areas, positions Vance as a champion for those who feel abandoned by both political parties. His sense of guilt over his own success—"I'm like the golden boy. Things worked out for ME...but I feel GUILT because there are a lot of people who grew up in families like mine who HAVEN'T had an easy life"—further humanizes his stance, making it clear that his advocacy is not just political but also moral. Vance’s call to action—"I want those people to have the same opportunities that I've had"—reinforces his commitment to uplifting American communities rather than relying on foreign labor or investment.

Moreover, Vance’s critique of leadership extends beyond immediate policy failures to a broader indictment of generational neglect. "And the reason that we have is because of failed leadership. And it's failed leadership over generations." This perspective frames the current challenges not as isolated incidents but as the result of systemic failures that require a fundamental shift in approach. His assertion that "if any place in this country deserves not to be left behind, it's Appalachia...they REALLY have been left behind by this country's leadership!" highlights a moral imperative to prioritize domestic needs, a sentiment that resonates far more with Trump’s base than the president’s recent overtures to foreign students and workers.

While Trump’s intentions aren’t malicious, his recent policy positions risk undermining the very coalition that brought him to power. The America First philosophy, as articulated by JD Vance, demands a focus on protecting and empowering American citizens, particularly those in struggling regions like Appalachia. Vance’s ability to connect personal experience with broader policy goals offers a roadmap for a more authentic and effective implementation of America First principles. As the Republican Party navigates these tensions, it’s not too late for Trump himself to reverse course and deliver for his base. The voters deserve it. Americans deserve it.